
Secureroot's Breach Attack Simulation (BAS) service continuously validates whether your security controls actually detect and prevent real adversary techniques - not just at annual pen test time, but every day. Automated MITRE ATT&CK technique coverage, security control efficacy measurement, drift detection, Purple Team integration. Replace annual point-in-time security testing with continuous empirical validation. ISO 27001 certified team. CERT-In aligned.

















Breach Attack Simulation (BAS) is the AUTOMATED, CONTINUOUS testing of your security controls against real adversary techniques – measuring empirically whether your security stack detects, prevents, and responds to attacks. Unlike annual pen testing (point-in-time), unlike red teaming (rare and expensive), BAS runs continuously – daily, weekly, monthly – providing ongoing data on whether your defenses actually work. BAS platforms (AttackIQ, SafeBreach, Cymulate, Picus, Mandiant Security Validation) safely execute thousands of adversary techniques against your environment, measure detection and prevention rates, and produce evidence-grade reports on actual security efficacy.
Three related but distinct approaches. Pen Testing: point-in-time depth testing for specific vulnerabilities, usually annual or quarterly, focuses on technical vulnerabilities, results in finding lists. Red Teaming: realistic full-spectrum adversary emulation, expensive multi-week engagements, tests detection and response holistically, results in scenario narratives. BAS: continuous automated testing of specific MITRE ATT&CK techniques, broad coverage rather than deep, focuses on control efficacy and coverage gaps, results in continuous metrics. The three complement each other. Mature security programs run all three – pen testing for depth, red teaming for realism, BAS for continuous measurement. BAS is the foundation; the others are periodic supplements.
Modern security stacks include 30-80 different tools – EDR, SIEM, NDR, CASB, email security, web filters, DLP, identity protection, cloud security, application security. Each generates marketing claims about what it detects. None tell you what they ACTUALLY detect in YOUR environment with YOUR configuration. BAS provides empirical answers: which controls actually fire on which techniques? Where are coverage gaps? Which expensive tools provide overlapping coverage? Where does configuration drift erode protection between deployments? Boards increasingly demand evidence-based security reporting, not vendor marketing. BAS provides that evidence – continuously, empirically, defensibly.


Aligned with MITRE ATT&CK framework, MITRE Engenuity ATT&CK Evaluations methodology, threat-informed defense principles, and Gartner CTEM (Continuous Threat Exposure Management). Every BAS engagement runs through these six continuous phases.

We establish your threat profile: industry-relevant adversaries, geographical targeting, asset criticality, current security stack inventory (EDR, SIEM, firewalls, identity, cloud security, email security), prior testing history. Initial baseline simulation across MITRE ATT&CK tactics establishes starting posture – what’s working, what isn’t, where gaps exist.

Tailored simulation library curated for your environment. Coverage includes: APT-specific scenarios (relevant nation-state actors), ransomware actor TTPs (LockBit, BlackCat, Akira, RansomHub), commodity malware behaviours, insider threat scenarios, cloud-specific attacks, identity-based attacks. Library mapped to MITRE ATT&CK with severity ratings and execution methods.

We design the continuous testing schedule: daily lightweight scenarios for high-criticality controls, weekly broader coverage tests, monthly comprehensive MITRE ATT&CK Navigator validation, quarterly deep-scenario testing, ad-hoc testing after major changes (deployment, M&A, breach response). Schedule balanced for signal generation without alert fatigue.

Simulations execute safely in production environment. BAS platforms (AttackIQ, SafeBreach, Cymulate, Picus, Mandiant Security Validation) used based on your environment. Measurements captured: technique-by-technique detection rate, prevention rate, response time, false positives, agent telemetry. NO actual damage – only safe behavioural simulation. SOC visibility during execution to capture full response cycle.

Each simulation produces detailed analysis: which controls fired, which didn’t, why gaps exist (missing rule, misconfiguration, agent failure, exclusion), comparison to historical baseline (improving or degrading?), prioritised remediation per gap. Executive dashboards visualise MITRE ATT&CK coverage heatmap, trends, peer comparisons. Audit-ready evidence packets generated automatically.

Findings drive continuous improvement: SOC rule tuning, EDR policy enhancement, SIEM correlation refinement, identity policy strengthening, cloud security hardening. Re-testing validates improvements. Purple Team exercises (BAS + SOC collaboration) accelerate detection capability development. Monthly executive readouts and quarterly board reports translate technical findings to business outcomes.

Click any capability to expand. Our BAS engagements deliver all 8 capabilities – comprehensive continuous validation across your security stack and adversary techniques.
Comprehensive testing across MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise framework: 14 tactics, 600+ techniques and sub-techniques. We measure your control efficacy per technique with detection rate, prevention rate, response time. Coverage visualised in MITRE ATT&CK Navigator heatmaps showing strengths (green) and gaps (red). Prioritised by industry-relevant adversaries - emphasising techniques your actual threat actors use. Output: empirical evidence of which adversary techniques your security stack actually catches.
Email is the #1 initial access vector. Continuous testing includes: phishing campaign simulation (credential harvesting, malware delivery, BEC scenarios), email gateway efficacy testing (does Proofpoint/Mimecast/Defender actually block what it claims?), attachment-based malware delivery testing, link-based attack simulation, callback phishing scenarios. Measurement: gateway block rates, EDR detection of evasive payloads, user click-through rates, SOC alert generation. Critical for measuring complete email defense stack.
Endpoint security claims often exceed reality. We test what EDR/AV solutions actually detect and prevent. Coverage includes: known malware family simulations, fileless attacks (PowerShell, WMI, living-off-the-land binaries), credential theft attempts (Mimikatz, LSASS dumping), privilege escalation, persistence mechanisms, defense evasion, ransomware behaviours. Tests run safely without damage. Output: empirical comparison of vendor marketing vs actual performance in YOUR environment.
Network security validation through controlled lateral movement simulation. Coverage includes: internal reconnaissance, SMB/RDP propagation, Kerberoasting and credential abuse, exploitation of internal services, C2 communication detection (DNS tunneling, encrypted C2, domain fronting), data staging and exfiltration patterns. Tests network segmentation efficacy, NDR detection capability, internal SIEM correlation. Critical for organisations claiming Zero Trust - BAS validates whether claims match reality.
Cloud security claims often untested. We safely test: cloud identity attacks (privilege escalation, IAM abuse), cloud service exploitation (S3 misconfigurations, exposed APIs, container escapes), cloud-specific attack patterns (cryptocurrency mining, instance metadata abuse, serverless attacks), CSPM detection efficacy, cloud SIEM correlation, cloud workload protection (CWPP) efficacy. Coverage across AWS, Azure, GCP. Critical for cloud-native organisations or substantial cloud workloads.
Beyond measurement, we improve detection capability through Purple Team exercises. BAS executes a technique. SOC investigates whether they detected and how they responded. If they missed it: we work together to develop detection rule, deploy it, retest, validate improvement. This collaborative red-team-meets-blue-team approach systematically improves detection coverage. Often delivers fastest ROI - 50-80% improvement in MITRE ATT&CK coverage within 6-12 months through structured Purple Teaming.
Security controls degrade over time - invisible to operations teams. BAS catches drift: agent failures (EDR offline on key endpoints), policy changes (DLP exclusions added, alert thresholds raised), configuration updates that broke detection, vendor signature regression. Continuous testing reveals when something that worked yesterday stops working today. Automated alerting on detection regression. Critical for large environments where drift is invisible without empirical testing.
Continuous audit evidence increasingly demanded by frameworks. BAS generates: ISO 27001 A.8.34 evidence (continuous testing of security controls), SOC 2 CC7 evidence (effective monitoring and response), PCI DSS Requirement 11.4 evidence (penetration testing), RBI/IRDAI evidence of ongoing security efficacy. Replaces annual one-off testing with year-round defensible documentation. Faster audits, more rigorous evidence, lower per-audit cost. Audit committees love the empirical rigor.








M2i Consulting
SecureRoot's expertise in banking technology cybersecurity was crucial for our Varta platform's success. Their comprehensive VAPT assessment and BFSI compliance framework enabled us to secure communications for India's largest banks while maintaining the performance that drives 3x revenue uplift for our clients. Their security solutions directly contributed to our market leadership in customer communication management.
FCI CCM
SecureRoot demonstrated exceptional expertise in government digital services cybersecurity. Their comprehensive security assessment of our Sahl platform and electronic judicial systems exceeded our national security expectations. We now operate the most secure government digital services in the region, ensuring complete protection for citizen data and legal proceedings.
Ministry of Justice, Kuwait
SecureRoot's specialized healthcare cybersecurity expertise transformed our operations management platform security. Their comprehensive VAPT assessment and HIPAA compliance framework enabled us to deliver secure, efficient healthcare solutions while protecting sensitive patient data. We now provide our healthcare partners with industry-leading security alongside operational excellence.
HOM India Pvt Ltd

Straight answers, no marketing speak. If you don’t see your question here, just ask – info@secureroot.co.
Three complementary approaches. Pen Testing: point-in-time depth testing (annual/quarterly), focuses on finding specific vulnerabilities, results in finding lists. Red Teaming: realistic full-spectrum adversary emulation (expensive multi-week engagements), tests detection and response holistically. BAS: continuous automated testing of MITRE ATT&CK techniques (daily/weekly), focuses on control efficacy measurement, results in continuous metrics. Mature security programs run all three. Pen testing for depth, red teaming for realism, BAS for continuous measurement. BAS provides the year-round baseline; pen testing and red teaming add periodic depth.
BAS pricing in India typically ranges between ₹1,50,000 and ₹8,00,000 per month depending on environment size and platform. Mid-size organisations (under 500 endpoints, basic MITRE ATT&CK coverage, monthly cadence): ₹1,50,000-3,00,000 per month. Large enterprises (500-5000 endpoints, comprehensive coverage including cloud, weekly cadence): ₹3,00,000-6,00,000 per month. Enterprise (5000+ endpoints, multi-environment, daily cadence, Purple Teaming): ₹6,00,000-8,00,000+ per month. Platform licensing (AttackIQ, SafeBreach, Cymulate, Picus) typically billed separately or pass-through. Transparent fixed-price quoting after assessment.
Yes - BAS platforms are explicitly designed for safe production execution. Simulations use benign payloads matching adversary BEHAVIOURS without actual damage. For example: testing whether EDR detects credential dumping uses a benign tool that triggers identical detection patterns as Mimikatz - but doesn't actually steal credentials. Testing ransomware detection uses benign file modifications that match encryption behaviour without actually encrypting business data. All simulations include kill switches and rollback procedures. Major BAS vendors have execution in thousands of production environments globally - safety is foundational to the methodology.
Depends on your environment, budget, and goals. We're platform-agnostic and recommend based on your situation. AttackIQ: strong MITRE ATT&CK alignment, good for security-mature teams focused on detection engineering. SafeBreach: comprehensive scenario library, strong for security operations teams. Cymulate: user-friendly, good for mid-market organisations starting BAS journey. Picus: strong threat-informed defense focus, good for SOC-heavy environments. Mandiant Security Validation: tight integration with Mandiant threat intelligence, premium pricing. Open-source/free: Atomic Red Team, MITRE Caldera (good for technical teams comfortable with custom setup). We assess your environment and recommend best fit.
Subtle but important distinction. Continuous pen testing scales traditional pen testing methodology - automated tools running pen test workflows continuously, focused on finding vulnerabilities. BAS focuses on validating CONTROL EFFICACY - does your security stack detect adversary techniques? Different questions: 'do I have vulnerabilities?' (pen test) vs 'do my controls actually catch attacks if exploitation succeeds?' (BAS). Both valuable, complementary. Many organisations run both. Continuous pen testing reveals exploitable vulnerabilities; BAS reveals whether your defenses catch exploitation. Together they provide complete picture: prevent through fewer vulnerabilities, detect when prevention fails.
Initial results within days. Onboarding 2-4 weeks. Detailed pipeline: Week 1 - environment assessment, BAS platform deployment or integration, initial baseline simulations across core MITRE ATT&CK tactics. Week 2 - full simulation library tuned for your threat profile, baseline measurements established. Week 3 - continuous testing cadence activated, initial gap remediation begins. Week 4 — first comprehensive coverage report, executive baseline established. From this point: continuous improvement through ongoing testing. Most organisations see 30-50% improvement in measured MITRE ATT&CK coverage within first 6 months through systematic gap closure.
No - BAS amplifies and improves SOC capability rather than replacing it. SOC operates the monitoring and response capability. BAS tests whether SOC effectively detects and responds to adversary techniques. They work together: BAS reveals SOC coverage gaps, SOC responds to BAS-generated alerts (validating SOC processes), Purple Teaming exercises align BAS and SOC for collaborative improvement. Many organisations find BAS dramatically improves SOC ROI - same SOC team, better detection coverage, faster response times, more accurate alerting. SOC + BAS combination is increasingly the modern security operations standard.
Three ways to start: (1) Book a free 30-minute BAS maturity scoping call - our senior consultants assess your security stack, threat profile, current testing maturity, and propose realistic BAS roadmap with timeline and platform recommendations. No obligation. (2) Email info@secureroot.co with details (organisation size, current security tools, existing testing programs, target outcomes) and we'll respond within one business day. (3) Call +91 73071 48874 during business hours. For mature security teams ready for sophisticated continuous validation, we accommodate rapid platform deployment and onboarding.
No obligation. Our senior consultants will walk through your environment and share where the gaps are. Whether you work with us or not.

Cybersecurity that helps Indian and Middle Eastern enterprises move from “hope we’re safe” to “we’ve got this.”
Follow us
Copyright © 2026 Secureroot Risk Advisory LLP. All rights reserved.
SecureRoot's deep understanding of microfinance and financial inclusion cybersecurity challenges was transformational for our operations. Their comprehensive VAPT assessment and ESG compliance framework enabled us to secure our technology solutions while maintaining the efficiency our clients depend on. We now confidently serve major multilateral agencies with enterprise-grade data protection.